The Stasi legacy and its impact on modern surveillance - English

Lessons from the Stasi

By Thomas Coombes31.03.2015Europe

Exactly 25 years ago, the notorious East German Ministry for State Security, or Stasi as it came to be known, was shut down. But it’s legacy still lingers on.

da2396fdf3.jpeg

Four decades of domination over almost all aspects of life in East Germany came to an abrupt halt exactly 25 years ago. On 31 March 1990, one of the most intrusive surveillance organisations in human history, the Ministry for State Security, more infamously known as the Stasi, was dissolved.

This is a poignant milestone as a global debate about privacy rages in the wake of revelations of massive US surveillance of internet communications.

Two months ago I was at the old Stasi headquarters, today a “museum()”:http://www.stasimuseum.de/en/enindex.htm in Berlin, for an “open day()”:http://www.bstu.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/20141212_online-flyer_buergertag.pdf;jsessionid=07366EA5DBF51704A5A6628CD4AA299E.2_cid319?__blob=publicationFile commemorating the storming of the building by East Germans a few weeks after the Berlin Wall fell. There were film screenings, discussions, information stands and a tour through the Stasi’s enormous archive that at one point contained files on an estimated six million people. Some say a file was kept for one in three citizens.

It took me an hour to wander through the archive. Thousands of Germans visiting the site appeared shell-shocked amid the labyrinth of corridors and ceiling-high filing cabinets that had documented and controlled their lives – or the lives of others – for years. The very building, with its grey concrete Communist-era architecture, was a symbol of fear – the place you were taken for interrogation or intimidation.

While the Stasi archive is overwhelming, today’s spies can gather far more information with a fraction of the effort. The Snowden revelations “suggest()”:https://www.amnesty.org/en/campaign-unfollowme/ the NSA can collect 5 billion records of mobile phone location a day and 42 billion internet records – including email and browsing history – a month.

German organisation OpenDataCity “estimates()”:https://apps.opendatacity.de/stasi-vs-nsa/english.html that while the Stasi archives would fill 48,000 filing cabinets, just one US government server could store so much data that, if printed out, the reams of paper would fill 42 trillion filing cabinets.

We know very little about what the NSA does with all this data. But, leaving historical parallels aside, the Stasi archive is a timely warning of the potential consequences of unchecked surveillance. It shows how quickly a system for identifying threats evolves into a desire to know everything about everyone.

Knowledge is power, so is personal data

If knowledge is power, then by extension so is our personal data. The Stasi took surveillance to unprecedented, intrusive levels to gather deep knowledge about what people did and said, which they used to manipulate and control the population.

Like the USA and the UK, who today intercept our emails and internet records, the Stasi sought to infiltrate personal life to collect intimate information about peoples’ lives to identify those they considered a threat. In the Stasi museum today you can see the personal and seemingly inane material kept on file, including photographs of bedrooms and record collections.

The Stasi’s surveillance network spiralled out into every aspect of daily life. Among an estimated 274,000 employees were at least 174,000 informants, which would have been about 2.5% of the working population.

Informants snooped in every office, cultural and sporting society, and apartment building. They recorded people in their own homes and in the homes of their friends.
Modern mass surveillance achieves this omnipresence with a fraction of the manpower. Spies can scoop up massive quantities of electronic communications directly from the cables that deliver them and the servers that store them. Cold War snoops have been pushed aside by computers and algorithms.

Tools of the spy trade

Visit the Stasi museum and you will see the sinister spying tools and techniques of the past: machines for steaming open letters, disguises (fake moustaches) and training for infiltrating “subversive” groups and the cameras hidden in ties, cigarette packs or simply in apartment walls. The Stasi steamed open letters, copied them, filed them and sent them on. They went into homes when people were out and bugged them. They tapped into the phone infrastructure of buildings.

By contrast, today’s spies sit behind a desk and rely on dozens of electronic programmes for spying on our life, from “Prism to Tempora()”:https://www.amnesty.org/en/articles/blogs/2015/03/10-spy-programmes-with-silly-codenames-used-by-gchq-and-nsa/, to do the dirty work for them.

The NSA uses computer programmes like _Optic Nerve_ to access web chats, or _The Three Smurfs_ to turn on your mobile phone’s microphone to listen in and track your location. For the Stasi, that technology would have been “a dream come true” in the “words()”:http://reason.com/blog/2013/06/28/nsas-surveillance-operations-the-envy-of of one former officer.

What is in your file?

The most emotionally-charged discovery for many visitors to the Stasi archive is finding out whether the secret police had a file on them.

Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, 2.75 million people have asked to see their files. Germans and many foreigners who visited East Germany have been shocked to discover that Stasi spies took an interest in where they went and what they said, but also who spied on them – sometimes friends and family had been recruited or blackmailed into the informant network.

No wonder Germans are more convinced than their European neighbours about the importance of the human right to privacy. A whopping 69% of them are opposed to government mass surveillance, according to a recent Amnesty International “poll()”:https://www.amnesty.org/en/articles/news/2015/03/global-opposition-to-usa-big-brother-mass-surveillance/ conducted in 13 countries around the world.

!http://c3445010.r10.cf0.rackcdn.com/landscape_image/9111/big_8410f80d7d.png!

We don’t yet know what impact mass surveillance of our internet use will have on today’s digital societies. But by its very existence, the Stasi museum shows how the chilling effect surveillance can have on free expression. As a result, few Germans take their right to privacy lightly.

There are important lessons for us to learn from this. The question is, in 25 years will millions be asking the NSA or other intelligence agencies for our files, to see if they snooped on our private lives?

_Read more about Amnesty International’s #UnfollowMe anti-surveillance campaign “here()”:https://www.amnesty.org/en/campaign-unfollowme/._

COMMENTS

MOST COMMENTED

Most People Are Rationally Ignorant

What decisions would we make if we deliberated carefully about public policy? Alexander Görlach sat down with Stanford's James Fishkin to discuss deliberative democracy, parliamentary discontent, and the future of the two-party system.

A Violent Tea Party?

For many Europeans the massacre in Arizona is another evidence that political violence is spreading in the United States but this unfortunate event was the deed of a mentally ill person, not a political activist. There is no evidence of an increasing political extremism tearing America apart. Using

Passage to India

The US and Russia don't agree on much - but they are both keen to develop a good relationship with India. How do we know? Look at the arms trade.

"Cities are making us more human"

More than 50 percent of the world's population now live in cities – and there is no end of urbanization in sight. Harvard economist Edward Glaeser believes urbanization to be a solution to many unanswered problems: pollution, depression and a lack of creativity. He spoke with Lars Mensel about the

No Glove, No Love

Contrary to the mantras repeated by the press, HIV infections are not increasing. We need to move away from activist scare tactics and towards complex risk management strategies.

Perfection Is Not A Useful Concept

Nick Bostrom directs the Future of Humanity Institute at Oxford University. He talked with Martin Eiermann about existential risks, genetic enhancements and the importance of ethical discourses about technological progress.

Mobile Sliding Menu