A Network of Networks, Unfazed by Censorship

By Sheldon Himelfarb25.02.2011Global Policy

Much has been written about the role of the internet in Tunisia and Egypt. One thing is certain: The internet is becoming harder to censor. It is a network of networks that connects online and offline and provides a lifeline to the outside world.

It is hard to turn on the news these days without hearing a discussion of the role of social media in the recent events in the Middle East. But what our research tells us, first and foremost, is that we won’t have a clear picture of this until the dust settles, and the data is collected and analyzed. Last year’s so-called Twitter Revolution in Iran ultimately proved to be neither a revolution nor twitter-driven upon careful analysis of the activity on that platform. We also know from our research that any insightful analysis of social media’s role requires disentangling the different channels (blogs, tweets, facebook, tv, print) as well as different levels of activism — individual, group, inter-group, and regime. In other words, it’s complicated and, next week in Silicon Valley, USIP is bringing together an array of some of the best researchers on the Internet and social media with the companies themselves (Facebook, YouTube, Ebay, Google etc.) to try and unpack the incredible events of the last few months.

A complicated picture

So that’s what our research has told us – don’t rush to judgment about the role of technology in anything as complex as political and social change. Undoubtedly, what we’ve seen across the last few months is a function of people and passion first and foremost, rather than any particular technology platform. At the same time, I want to call out the voices of the activists themselves – whether it’s Wael Ghonim, the Google executive who was jailed for helping to organize the protests in Egypt, or Ai Wei Wei in China who was also jailed for his activism – their answer is unequivocal: the Internet is an absolutely key enabler of their efforts to drive social change. Its social networks are part of a vast web of instantaneous information lines into and out of these countries that connects the protesters to each other and to the outside world in the run-up to the street protests. And if these networks, communicating via the Internet and mobile phones, weren’t so critical, you can be sure that the government would not have hit the “kill switch” the way it did in Egypt. This was really unprecedented. In virtually every other case of new media-connected movements – Tunisia, Iran, for example – the governments were much more moderated in cutting off access, slowing things down, opening them back up, slowing them down. Egypt really was the first of its kind, in terms of near total blackout for a couple of days – raising all sorts of worrying questions.

Protesting and media coverage never stopped

But the fact remains – the protesting never stopped nor did the media coverage of events. The flow of information continued, due in some measure to these social networks, since what’s at work here is really a network of networks. Some are more vulnerable than others – especially where most people, as in Egypt, rely on the large centralized services like Gmail or Twitter which in fact are quite easy for the governments to impede. But the Internet is strikingly resilient because at its core it is, as I said, this network of networks. So activists quickly figure out innovative work-arounds. And if you followed social media across the Middle East protests you saw this happening – reports from inside Egypt delivered via third party proxies –to continually enable communication with the outside world, as well among the activists themselves. For those on the ground, trying to change history, the Internet and social media was a vital lifeline.

COMMENTS

MOST COMMENTED

Most People Are Rationally Ignorant

What decisions would we make if we deliberated carefully about public policy? Alexander Görlach sat down with Stanford's James Fishkin to discuss deliberative democracy, parliamentary discontent, and the future of the two-party system.

A Violent Tea Party?

For many Europeans the massacre in Arizona is another evidence that political violence is spreading in the United States but this unfortunate event was the deed of a mentally ill person, not a political activist. There is no evidence of an increasing political extremism tearing America apart. Using

Passage to India

The US and Russia don't agree on much - but they are both keen to develop a good relationship with India. How do we know? Look at the arms trade.

"Cities are making us more human"

More than 50 percent of the world's population now live in cities – and there is no end of urbanization in sight. Harvard economist Edward Glaeser believes urbanization to be a solution to many unanswered problems: pollution, depression and a lack of creativity. He spoke with Lars Mensel about the

No Glove, No Love

Contrary to the mantras repeated by the press, HIV infections are not increasing. We need to move away from activist scare tactics and towards complex risk management strategies.

Perfection Is Not A Useful Concept

Nick Bostrom directs the Future of Humanity Institute at Oxford University. He talked with Martin Eiermann about existential risks, genetic enhancements and the importance of ethical discourses about technological progress.

Mobile Sliding Menu