Trump’s Words: a Lethal Dose for Democracy? - English

Trump’s Words: Preparatory Function for Actions?

By Paul Sailer-Wlasits18.01.2021Europe

The U.S. has become the world’s test laboratory where the tensile strength, elasticity and hyperextension of democratic structures have been examined as on a living organism.

United States President Donald J. Trump departs after making a statement to the nation as his supporters look on in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC on Election Night, Foto: imago images / ZUMA Wire

As of this precedent, all subsequent U.S. administrations will grasp just how immeasurably far they will be able to go in the future. During the 45th presidency, its administration perceived new, brutally expanded limits, both nationally and internationally. Many political autocrats around the world observed America with fascination and learned. Using the US model as an example, they can now gauge how far they will be able to overextend the democratic structures in their own countries without losing widespread approval.

Verbal transgressions, superlative expressions and monumental language marked the beginning of the 45th U.S. presidency. With its sustained toxic language and consequences, the four-year language-derailment-continuum is coming to an end.

Mass appeal comes at a high price

The pathways of language, from simplification to prejudice and from fear-mongering to hostile rhetoric, have narrowed. Free speech and unrestrained language have converged. Political language fell into poverty once 140 characters started to be considered a political position.

During these four entire years, too few Republicans had the courage and will to restrain the president. The economic rationale and considerations of power were too clearly in their favor. Some Republicans have even burdened themselves with historic guilt during the 45th presidency by actively allowing political damage to first emerge, then metastasize and then finally become the norm.

Lack of experience with deceit

In light of the language-fueled attack on the icon of democracy in Washington, a severe shortcoming has become apparent. This is the historic deficiency of never having to deal with the language of dictatorship on US soil, as Europe had to do some 80 years ago.

For it was only a few decades ago, that the German language fell into the monstrous stranglehold of Nazi dictatorship. The most horrible of all human catastrophes was preceded by the deformation of German into a hate-distorted, racist language.

The crude Nazi-diction shattered the language on two levels: First, on the level of the roaring and fanatical, hysterical and inflammatory speeches of Hitler and Goebbels. Second, on the level of what I have dubbed “gentle verbal radicalism”, a latent deformation of language lying dormant in thousands of re-coded words of everyday life. The latter is a perfidious, silent penetration and slow poisoning of everyday language: When words like “patriots” are being re-coded, when freedom of speech is undermined by implicitly denying it to a part of society, such as naming critical media “fake news”.

Dignity of the other

Freedom of speech, like freedom of thought, is infinite. Nonetheless, free speech and the rights of the other can never be made completely congruent; they can only be gently brought closer to one another. This rapprochement has not sufficiently materialized to date. Social media corporations are developing at two speeds: Rapid technological progress contrasting with a creeping-slow development of ethical guidelines. The outgoing U.S. president was able to take advantage of this gap by interpreting freedom of speech in the sense of unrestrained language. He was able to build up a loyal group of tens of millions of political followers as was last possible at this speed only in Nazi Germany and Nazi Austria of the 1930s and 1940s.

The decay of political language

Political language is consigned to the brink of ruin when instead of differentiated discourse, populist simplification begins to prevail. When the language of top-level policymakers drifts from the undifferentiated to the simple and further to the banal.

The complexity of the world was further diminished by means of reductive language, employing declarative phrases and politically emotive buzzwords. A path along which populist language with its rhetoric of resentment became too frequently and too effortlessly ethnicized.

Words as preparatory function for actions

Aggravating language developments, however, do not simply progress indefinitely. At their very peak, they prepare a new dimension: One in which the deed surpasses the word. Ultimately, the transition from word to act remains a qualitative leap. It cannot be derived from a single cause. It is a process of mutually reinforcing speech acts and the cumulative effects of language practices. It arises from semantic overcharges as well as from instructions for action.

The transition from verbal radicalism to violent acts does not unfold by necessity. But when latent hatred is awakened by language, it becomes manifest and thus unleashed. Verbal transgressions have preparatory effects for developments in which acts transcend words.

Lies and the marketplace of political language

Politics and lies have entered into a mésalliance that has lasted for millennia. The societal collateral damage of political lies, prejudice and hate speech is enormous. Deliberate transgressions within the semantic space possess a very real verbal explosive power. They disrupt and undermine the existing order of discourse like an irritating, distorting communication code.

Moreover, the language of politics is neither tied to honesty nor truth. It does not succeed on the marketplace of language by means of veracity, but by the fact that a societal majority believes it to be true. Statements that are believed to be true suffice to win elections. Regrettable as it may be, rhetoric has always triumphed over veracity and truth, at least in the short term.

Social media in the light of testimony

Up until just a few days ago, many social media platforms allowed at least a partial deception of the masses through persistent lies and contaminated language. Deleting and suspending the outgoing president’s social media accounts is a step in the right direction. It contributes to social peace in the short term. In the medium term, it fosters the convergence of what, at present, are irreconcilable opposing positions.

In the long term, however, digitally marginalizing such information seems to be highly problematic. Those thousands of tweets should be preserved and kept accessible within Twitter as they need to be analyzed at a later point in time: Politically and sociologically, psychologically and linguistically. Testimonies are irreplaceable and indispensable, for historic eras can only be perceived in their entirety after they have concluded.

 

COMMENTS

MOST COMMENTED

Most People Are Rationally Ignorant

What decisions would we make if we deliberated carefully about public policy? Alexander Görlach sat down with Stanford's James Fishkin to discuss deliberative democracy, parliamentary discontent, and the future of the two-party system.

A Violent Tea Party?

For many Europeans the massacre in Arizona is another evidence that political violence is spreading in the United States but this unfortunate event was the deed of a mentally ill person, not a political activist. There is no evidence of an increasing political extremism tearing America apart. Using

Passage to India

The US and Russia don't agree on much - but they are both keen to develop a good relationship with India. How do we know? Look at the arms trade.

"Cities are making us more human"

More than 50 percent of the world's population now live in cities – and there is no end of urbanization in sight. Harvard economist Edward Glaeser believes urbanization to be a solution to many unanswered problems: pollution, depression and a lack of creativity. He spoke with Lars Mensel about the

No Glove, No Love

Contrary to the mantras repeated by the press, HIV infections are not increasing. We need to move away from activist scare tactics and towards complex risk management strategies.

Perfection Is Not A Useful Concept

Nick Bostrom directs the Future of Humanity Institute at Oxford University. He talked with Martin Eiermann about existential risks, genetic enhancements and the importance of ethical discourses about technological progress.

Mobile Sliding Menu