Why Greece should not leave the Eurozone - English

Uncertain Silver Linings

By Juliane Mendelsohn7.01.2015Europe

Unlike other European politicians, Alexis Tspiras may not be making empty promises. He may actually present a chance for real change. Radical change.



In light of the Greek elections and a possible Syrizian win, Europe, and Europe’s North in particular, has a lot to fear. Let’s not kid ourselves, Tspiras is actually a man who promises his people a living wage and pensioners the possibility to retrieve their meals from a place other than trashcans. _Quelle horreur!_

What has changed since we last debated a Greek exit, a total of three years ago? Three years is a long time. Long enough to ignore an insolvency and its causes and drive an economy into the ground completely. It is also long enough for banks and states to remove all funds from and investments in a country and to cut it off from the markets for good. Having stabilized neighbouring periphery states, this means that Greece can now default on its own, with less “external effects” or massive economic repercussions for anyone other than itself.

The most lucid dreams of Jean-Claude Juncker

Now that Greece is less “contagious”, it is easier than ever to turn it into a scapegoat, feeding only off its own insufficiencies. It is easy to assume that somehow the Hellenic state and its people are intrinsically incapable of being suitable and rational members of this economic union. There is no longer cause to concern ourselves with the underlying systemic causes of this crisis: the massive economic imbalances, a complete unwillingness to invest in common future and the huge incentives to speculate against a weaker member state that can and will bring it to its knees.

What has not changed is that when it comes to money, real Euro bills, there is no “Europe”, but rather each state fending for its own interest and ideology. In light of said elections, member states that – by virtue or force – turned austerity into dogma have a lot to fear. With no funds left to cut and no room to breathe, Tspiras is a man with nothing to loose. Unlike Hollande, Tspiras may not be making empty promises. He may actually present a chance for real change. Radical change.

Not radical in the sense of severely deranged, but rather in the sense of persisting on fundamental changes first to the effective bargaining power of the southern periphery and then to the economic policy of the EU. Tspiras would like to “tear up” the promises Greece made with the Troika and – like many others – put an end to austerity and a turn to investment-led crisis policies that couldn’t even feature in the most lucid dreams of Jean-Claude Juncker.

A tragedy we helped create

Should this will to power occur, they say the threats that Greece would be forced to leave Eurozone are not unsubstantiated. They also say – as they did three years ago – that this could even be good for Greece. That a worthless currency and a lot of sovereignty can go a long way… _that’s what people say_. It is however near certain that a Grexit without massive debt restructuring or a haircut could entirely demolish the Greek economy and any faith vested in it by the markets for further generations. The fact that it is has far less to loose than three years ago, does not entirely change this logic. And let us not forget that wrong crisis measures drove Greece this far into the ground. The continuous demise of the Greek economy is not a “game changer” but a tragedy we helped create.

For those of us who refuse to focus on pernicious and uncertain silver linings, let’s be sentimental for a moment. A Europe without the Hellenic State? Its birthplace outside its borders? The ultimate annihilation of any sense of solidarity in the European Union? I don’t mean to be overly conservative. But like in any good family, it’s still better, for everyone, if we get through this together.



Most People Are Rationally Ignorant

What decisions would we make if we deliberated carefully about public policy? Alexander Görlach sat down with Stanford's James Fishkin to discuss deliberative democracy, parliamentary discontent, and the future of the two-party system.

A Violent Tea Party?

For many Europeans the massacre in Arizona is another evidence that political violence is spreading in the United States but this unfortunate event was the deed of a mentally ill person, not a political activist. There is no evidence of an increasing political extremism tearing America apart. Using

Passage to India

The US and Russia don't agree on much - but they are both keen to develop a good relationship with India. How do we know? Look at the arms trade.

"Cities are making us more human"

More than 50 percent of the world's population now live in cities – and there is no end of urbanization in sight. Harvard economist Edward Glaeser believes urbanization to be a solution to many unanswered problems: pollution, depression and a lack of creativity. He spoke with Lars Mensel about the

No Glove, No Love

Contrary to the mantras repeated by the press, HIV infections are not increasing. We need to move away from activist scare tactics and towards complex risk management strategies.

Perfection Is Not A Useful Concept

Nick Bostrom directs the Future of Humanity Institute at Oxford University. He talked with Martin Eiermann about existential risks, genetic enhancements and the importance of ethical discourses about technological progress.

Mobile Sliding Menu