Consequences of Facebook’s WhatsApp Deal - English

The Sell-Out

By Juliane Mendelsohn24.02.2014Culture and Society, Economics

Since Facebook’s purchase of WhatsApp last week, the only media software people seem to like less than the former is the latter – and rightly so.

0fc03c452e.jpeg

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

“People that read Max Weber also read 50 Shades of Grey“, Amazon tells me. This is not true. But it works, I can now talk about the 50 shades of Protestantism, ask me about it, when you see me next.

Once upon a time Amazon sold mainly books. A couple of years ago, when Google started scanning the world’s supply of written words, many predicted that Amazon was on its way out. It had missed the next big innovation. But obviously being a social media corporate is not about innovation as much as it is about accumulating users. Amazon is now the “everything store”. It is hard to leave, and there’s simply no need to purchase goods anywhere else. Its users are captured in a space that only adds ease and efficiency to their boring lives.

Dancing crabs, pizza slices and party hats

All the while, Amazon has remained dominant in its original market. Though we all know that Amazon is as bad for books as batteries are for chickens, but as long as Amazon continues to “put consumers first“ people seem unconcerned about the long-term effects on intellectual life on this planet.

Two companies whose similar ideologies have been intercepted by reality are “don’t be evil”-Google and Facebook that only wants people to “like” and “share” random stuff. Since Facebook’s purchase of WhatsApp last week, the only media software people seem to like less than the former is the latter.

WhatsApp – the cute (though recently slightly dysfunctional) independent app – that made the SMS feel like etching into a stone tablet and replaced human contact and emotions with an incredible collection of dancing crabs, pizza slices, party hats and rabbits is now seen as green virus, a data snatcher, and more pertinently: a sell-out! We seem to love all start-ups until they actually start behaving like corporations and sell out to conglomerates.

We know that conglomerates (alias monopolies) are, in the long run, bad for consumers and for public life. But social media conglomerates have escaped the scrutiny applied to steel, oil, and telecommunication giants. They prefer not to pay taxes and get away with it, they needn’t justify their actions against trade unions because they don’t really have any employees (WhatsApp has 55) and billions of users willing to test their products for free. They are not harassed with regulations because governments don’t understand the industry and seem to have a conflict of interest when it comes to protecting personal data “too much”.

Facebook says that it purchased WhatsApp to “make the world more open and connected“. This was quickly translated into “Facebook is the new NSA“ and “Facebook now owns your phonebook (and a about million more of your precious “cat selfies()”:http://tumblr.tastefullyoffensive.com/post/50589230060/cats-taking-selfies-previously-cats-stuck-in#.UwoyYEKwYk4)”. Economically, this was the obvious next step for a conglomerate that cannot afford to lose users or even have them swim outside the control of their tides, where beguiling competitors loom just below the surface.

What is not true is that the world is more open. Most Internet traffic is now trapped in completely closed spaces owned by Google, Facebook, Amazon and Apple. These companies own our data, our movements, our habits, interests and secrets. Our response to WhatsApp’s purchase is heartening, to a point: like in the movie Inception, we have now exited the ‘deep’ level of the dream, and recognise these monopolies won’t act in our own interest for long. But we’re still in a dream where companies are the arbiters of our interest and freedoms.

Enough cash to sanitize sub-Saharan Africa

A notable new company to capture this idea is “Telegram”. Whilst this is insignificant to Facebook, Google and Amazon, it adds a new feature: secrecy. Currently, encrypting your emails is not only a bit of a hassle, but also makes you looks suspicious. But with 100 new users a second switching to Telegram, which allows you to send “secret messages“ and have them deleted automatically, encryption may come into common use.

Anyway, if you can’t revolt against your government or the NSA, why not take a swing at WhatsApp. Its previous owner now apparently have enough cash and Facebook shares to sanitize sub-Saharan Africa, or buy up the US Porn Industry just to shut it down. Or something.

COMMENTS

MOST COMMENTED

Most People Are Rationally Ignorant

What decisions would we make if we deliberated carefully about public policy? Alexander Görlach sat down with Stanford's James Fishkin to discuss deliberative democracy, parliamentary discontent, and the future of the two-party system.

A Violent Tea Party?

For many Europeans the massacre in Arizona is another evidence that political violence is spreading in the United States but this unfortunate event was the deed of a mentally ill person, not a political activist. There is no evidence of an increasing political extremism tearing America apart. Using

Passage to India

The US and Russia don't agree on much - but they are both keen to develop a good relationship with India. How do we know? Look at the arms trade.

"Cities are making us more human"

More than 50 percent of the world's population now live in cities – and there is no end of urbanization in sight. Harvard economist Edward Glaeser believes urbanization to be a solution to many unanswered problems: pollution, depression and a lack of creativity. He spoke with Lars Mensel about the

No Glove, No Love

Contrary to the mantras repeated by the press, HIV infections are not increasing. We need to move away from activist scare tactics and towards complex risk management strategies.

Perfection Is Not A Useful Concept

Nick Bostrom directs the Future of Humanity Institute at Oxford University. He talked with Martin Eiermann about existential risks, genetic enhancements and the importance of ethical discourses about technological progress.

Mobile Sliding Menu