Troika versus Syriza – the uncomfortable outcome - English

Three creditors and a joker

By Juliane Mendelsohn27.06.2015Europe

The game being played around the Greek crisis lays bare the failings of an entire political class.

b1fc2d36b5.jpeg

ARIS MESSINIS/AFP/Getty Images

After weeks of stalemate negotiations and never-ending game-theoretical analysis, Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras has drawn the joker or the so-called “democracy card.” Unable to be bailed-out and unwilling to be “black-mailed”, he has decided to abandon the negotiations and give the power entrusted upon him back to its primary source – back to the demos.

In many ways it seems particularly cruel and pernicious to leave the choice between pest and cholera – between a Grexit and a life of austerity – up to the Greek people. The Greek people are not to blame for their continuous slide into insolvency. As Yanis Varoufakis puts it: “democracy did not have a good day in Saturday’s Eurogroup meeting. But nor did the institutions.” And nor did Europe.

This is no game of visionaries

Within hours a Grexit no longer seemed unfathomable, impossible or undeserving. “Plan B is quickly becoming Plan A,“ was Finnish finance minister, Alexander Stubb’s, first reaction to Alexis Tsipras’ “bizarre” referendum announcement. Grexit seems “almost inevitable”, says Austria’s Finance Minister, Hans Jörg Schelling.

According to the creditors, a non-extension of the loans and ultimately a Greek exit is the result of the unwillingness of the Hellenic government to act as a humble debtor should and accept their “reasonable” conditions.

The game between creditors and debtors has never been a particularly moral one or one played by great visionaries. Back in ancient Rome, debtors were stripped of their rights as men until they were either able to service their debt or found a noble citizen to redeem them, or as we say today, to “bail them out.” If Merkel and the creditors had wanted a perfect or at least sustainable debtor, they should have given into the simple pleas of then-Greek PM Antonis Samaras for looser conditions and more time back in 2014. Instead they got Syriza.

To the dismay of the creditors and evermore the rest of Europe, Syriza came into government on the promise to abandon Greece’s role as a debtor and re-institutionalize the sovereignty and agency of the Hellenic republic.

Rather than accepting the moral debt of their dysfunctional and corrupt parliamentary heirs, Syriza fathoms itself as a revolutionary movement – a party in revolt against Europe: the institutions, their agreements and more than anything the dogma of austerity.

Where are the big ideas?

After seven years of crisis and Greek bankruptcy, Syriza hoped that, sooner rather than later, not only the creditors but all Europeans would come to water and realize that austerity alone cannot work wonders and will not solve Greece’s debt problem – not in the short run and probably not in the long. The malfunctions of our monetary system and austerity are not only the kinds of obvious truths or “known unknowns” that creditors choose to ignore, but that every European citizen and the so-called political class may have realized, if we were willing to think, to fight, to speak up for or to dream of a better and different Europe. After seven years of crisis, where are the big Keynes-like ideas and our willingness to overcome past mistakes, abandon wrong dogma, bad institutions and invest in our future?

The real tragedy is not that the institutions still want their money back or that Greece hasn’t magically found a source of growth or a spur of liquidity. The real tragedy is that we have left our entire political future up to a stalemate game between three creditors and a debtor.

Both the Grexit and the continuation of austerity will cost Europe billions and billions more in moral capital. Both alternatives are a failure. But they are not merely the failure of a negotiation; they are the failure of an entire political class.

COMMENTS

MOST COMMENTED

Most People Are Rationally Ignorant

What decisions would we make if we deliberated carefully about public policy? Alexander Görlach sat down with Stanford's James Fishkin to discuss deliberative democracy, parliamentary discontent, and the future of the two-party system.

A Violent Tea Party?

For many Europeans the massacre in Arizona is another evidence that political violence is spreading in the United States but this unfortunate event was the deed of a mentally ill person, not a political activist. There is no evidence of an increasing political extremism tearing America apart. Using

Passage to India

The US and Russia don't agree on much - but they are both keen to develop a good relationship with India. How do we know? Look at the arms trade.

"Cities are making us more human"

More than 50 percent of the world's population now live in cities – and there is no end of urbanization in sight. Harvard economist Edward Glaeser believes urbanization to be a solution to many unanswered problems: pollution, depression and a lack of creativity. He spoke with Lars Mensel about the

No Glove, No Love

Contrary to the mantras repeated by the press, HIV infections are not increasing. We need to move away from activist scare tactics and towards complex risk management strategies.

Perfection Is Not A Useful Concept

Nick Bostrom directs the Future of Humanity Institute at Oxford University. He talked with Martin Eiermann about existential risks, genetic enhancements and the importance of ethical discourses about technological progress.

Mobile Sliding Menu